http://www.islamtimes.org/vdcbwfbfsrhbfzp.qnur.html
Hampir 10.000 Takfiri Tewas di Suriah
Islam
Times -
Laporan itu mengatakan, sebagian besar takfiri yang tewas
berafiliasi dengan kelompok teroris Front al-Nusra dan Negara Islam
Irak-Levant (ISIL).
Teroris al-Qaeda (al-Alam)
Sebuah gerakan Salafi di Yordania mengungkapkan bahwa hampir 10.000 takfiri tewas di Suriah sejak konflik melanda negara itu pada tahun 2011, al-Alam melaporkan, Selasa (24/12/13), mengutip kantor berita Manama Voice.
Gerakan Jihad Salafi Yordaniia mengatakan bahwa 9.936 militan dari berbagai belahan dunia, terutama Tunisia, Libya dan Irak, tewas dalam tempo 3 tahun konflik di Suriah.
Sebanyak 1.902 takfiri asal Tunisia, 1.807 asal Libya, 1.432 asal Irak, 800 asal Palestina dan 202 asal Yordania termasuk di antara mereka yang tewas. Mayoritas mereka bergerak di bawah bendera teroris al-Qaeda.
Sementara 828 takfiri asal Libanon, 821 asal Mesir, 714 asal Saudi, 571 asal Yaman, 412 asal Maroko, 274 asal Aljazair, 71 asal Kuwiat, 42 asal Somalia, 21 asal Bahrain, 19 asal Oman, 9 asal Emirat, 8 asal Qatar, 3 asal Sudan, 1 asal Mauritians, dan 30 orang lainnya dari Kaukasus dan Albania telah menyetor nyawa mereka dalam konflik Suriah.
Laporan itu mengatakan, sebagian besar takfiri yang tewas berafiliasi dengan kelompok teroris Front al-Nusra dan Negara Islam Irak-Levant (ISIL).
Laporan lain mengatakan bahwa ekstrimis dari Eropa, Amerika dan Australia juga ikut 'berjuang' di Suriah.
Sebelumnya, sebuah studi Inggris menunjukkan bahwa sekitar 100.000 militan yang terpecah dalam 1.000 kelompok tengah 'berjuan' di Suriah 'melawan' pemerintah dan rakyat Suriah.[IT/AAL/NAT]
Perang Suriah
Salah satu anggota Takfiri binaan Arab Saudi dan Qatar mengaku telah membuat fatwa untuk menyembelih dan menerima uang serta senjata dari Qatar dan Arab Saudi.
Anggota Takfiri bernama Mohammad Anas Barakeh dan sejumlah teroris lainnya mengaku telah membunuh sejumlah warga sipil dan tentara Suriah dengan imbalan sejumlah uang dan senjata dari Qatar dan Arab Saudi.
Pengakuan jujur anggota Takfiri itu ditayangkan di TV Suriah pada Senin, 23/12/13, demikian SANA melaporkan.
Barakeh dalam pengakuannya mengatakan, ia bekerja atas nama ayahnya sebagai Imam Masjid Agung al-Qadam, dan sejak awal kejadian ia menyampaikan berbagai pidato hasutan untuk memprovokasi warga untuk melakukan protes sebelum ia bergabung dengan kelompok Takfiri yang bernama "al-Baraa bin Malik" yang dipimpin oleh Abu Hamza Zakaria.
Ditambahkannya, kelompoknya melakukan berbagai operasi teroris dengan menyerang pos-pos pemeriksaan militer di daerah al-Qadam dan daerah lain, membunuh dan membantai warga sipil.
Anggota dari Liwa al-Sahaba menculik tiga tentara dan dia sendiri yang memberi fatwa untuk menyembelih tawanan itu kecuali satu yang dibantai langsung oleh Abu Abdullah al-Salafi dengan meneriakkan "Allahu Akbar".
Barakeh dalam wawancara dengan TV Suriah itu menambahkan, kelompoknya menerima instruksi langsung dari luar negeri untuk memprovokasi rakyat supaya melawan negara dan menunjukkan, kelompoknya menerima 5 juta Syria Pound (SYP) dan berbagai senjata dari Qatar dan Arab Saudi.[IT/Onh/Ass]
Saudi dan Qatar Pendukung Utama Gerakan Takfiri Suriah
Islam
Times- http://www.islamtimes.org/vdcd5s0snyt0s96.lp2y.html
Anggota Takfiri bernama Mohammad Anas Barakeh dan sejumlah
teroris lainnya mengaku telah membunuh sejumlah warga sipil dan tentara
Suriah dengan imbalan sejumlah uang dan senjata dari Qatar dan Arab
Saudi.
Mohammad Anas Barakeh
Salah satu anggota Takfiri binaan Arab Saudi dan Qatar mengaku telah membuat fatwa untuk menyembelih dan menerima uang serta senjata dari Qatar dan Arab Saudi.
Anggota Takfiri bernama Mohammad Anas Barakeh dan sejumlah teroris lainnya mengaku telah membunuh sejumlah warga sipil dan tentara Suriah dengan imbalan sejumlah uang dan senjata dari Qatar dan Arab Saudi.
Pengakuan jujur anggota Takfiri itu ditayangkan di TV Suriah pada Senin, 23/12/13, demikian SANA melaporkan.
Barakeh dalam pengakuannya mengatakan, ia bekerja atas nama ayahnya sebagai Imam Masjid Agung al-Qadam, dan sejak awal kejadian ia menyampaikan berbagai pidato hasutan untuk memprovokasi warga untuk melakukan protes sebelum ia bergabung dengan kelompok Takfiri yang bernama "al-Baraa bin Malik" yang dipimpin oleh Abu Hamza Zakaria.
Ditambahkannya, kelompoknya melakukan berbagai operasi teroris dengan menyerang pos-pos pemeriksaan militer di daerah al-Qadam dan daerah lain, membunuh dan membantai warga sipil.
Anggota dari Liwa al-Sahaba menculik tiga tentara dan dia sendiri yang memberi fatwa untuk menyembelih tawanan itu kecuali satu yang dibantai langsung oleh Abu Abdullah al-Salafi dengan meneriakkan "Allahu Akbar".
Barakeh dalam wawancara dengan TV Suriah itu menambahkan, kelompoknya menerima instruksi langsung dari luar negeri untuk memprovokasi rakyat supaya melawan negara dan menunjukkan, kelompoknya menerima 5 juta Syria Pound (SYP) dan berbagai senjata dari Qatar dan Arab Saudi.[IT/Onh/Ass]
WACANA BARU PEMBONGKARAN KONSPIRASI SERANGAN WTC
http://cahyono-adi.blogspot.com/2013/12/wacana-baru-pembongkaran-konspirasi.html#.UrsXpPteFkg
Ada kata-kata bijak yang diyakini orang sejak dahulu kala, yaitu
"kebohongan tidak akan bisa disembunyikan selamanya". Atau perkataan
bijak pemimpin revolusi Amerika: "Sebagian orang bisa dibohongi
selamanya, semua orang bisa dibohongi sementara waktu, namun semua orang
tidak bisa dibohongi selamanya".
Mengapa "kalangan mapan" Amerika kini mulai gerah dengan "teori konspirasi" Serangan WTC tahun 2001? Bukankah ini menunjukkan bahwa "pada akhirnya kebenaran yang akan menang"?
Selama bertahun-tahun sebagian publik Amerika telah meyakini bahwa pemerintah Amerika terlibat dalam Serangan WTC. Sebelas tahun yang lalu Michael Moore telah lama menulis buku Stupid White Men dan dilanjutkan dengan film dokumenter Fahrenheit 911 yang memaparkan dengan jelas keterlibatan Presiden George Bush Jr dalam serangan tersebut. Puluhan kelompok masyarakat seperti asosiasi insinyur, asosiasi pemadam kebakaran, hingga para veteran pejabat keamanan dan inteligen Amerika telah mengirim petisi penolakan terhadap klaim pemerintah tentang Serangan WTC dan tuntutan diadakannya penyelidikan independen atas insiden tersebut. Tidak terhitung media-media dan blogger independen yang memaparkan secara mendetil konspirasi Serangan WTC.
Hingga pada tgl 17 Desember lalu blog milik kelompok "oposisi terkooptasi" Tea Party, Family Security Matters, menuliskan laporan keterlibatan kepala inteligen Saudi Pangeran Bandar bin Sultan dalam Serangan WTC. Sedikit berbeda dengan Michael Moore yang menekankan George W Bush sebagai konspirator utama dibantu kerajaan Saudi Arabia, maka laporan yang dibuat oleh Paul Sperry dari Hoover Institute tersebut menekankan pada peran Bandar bin Sultan sebagai konspirator utama dengan dibantu oleh George W Bush. Untuk adilnya anggap saja baik George W Bush maupun Bandar bin Sultan adalah konspirator utama Serangan WTC.
Tapi benarkah hal itu yang sebenarnya terjadi? Mengapa, baik Michael Moore maupun Paul Sperry tidak menyinggung keterlibatan Israel dan lobi yahudi Amerika? Mengapa mereka tidak menyinggung kedatangan Benjamin Netanyahu pada hari terjadinya Serangan WTC? Mengapa mereka tidak menyinggung peran Larry Silverstein, pemilik Kompleks WTC berdarah yahudi dengan dikenal dekat dengan para pejabat Israel? Mengapa mereka tidak menyinggung tentang "5 dancing Israelis", yaitu 5 agen Mossad yang menyamar sebagai pelajar Israel yang ditangkap polisi New York saat berpesta ria setelah merekam runtuhnya Gedung WTC?
Baik Michael Moore maupun Paul Sperry adalah "agen provokator" zionis internasional yang ditugaskan untuk mengalihkan perhatian publik dari keterlibatan Israel dan orang-orang yahudi, sama seperti Alex Jones dari Prisons Planet. Sementara Family Security Matters bukanlah sembarang blog. Ia adalah salah satu corong dari AIPAC, organisasi yahudi Amerika yang sangat berpengaruh. Editornya termasuk Senator Ted Cruz, mantan Menlu Condoleeza Rice dan mantan dubes Amerika di PBB yang sangat anti Islam, John Bolton.
Pemerintah Amerika dan Saudi tentu saja terlibat dalam konspirasi Serangan WTC, namun aktor utamanya adalah para zionis internasional.
Selama ini sebagian besar publik Amerika masih percaya pada keterangan pemerintah Amerika tentang Serangan WTC, yaitu sekelompok anggota Al Qaida dengan cara yang ajaib berhasil menerobos sistem keamanan bandara-bandara Amerika, membajak pesawat-pesawat komersil dan dengan ajaib pula mengendalikan pesawat-pesawat jet besar tersebut menghantam Menara Kembar WTC dan Gedung Pentagon. Keterangan pemerintah itu tidak menjelaskan mengapa sistem pertahanan udara Amerika yang sangat canggih itu tiba-tiba "mogok bekerja" sehingga pesawat-pesawat itu leluasa menabrakkan dirinya ke sasaran. Keterangan itu juga tidak menyebutkan runtuhnya Gedung WTC 7, gedung 47 lantai di kompleks WTC yang ikut-ikutan runtuh meski tidak terkena serangan.
Namun seiring berkembangnya informasi, terutama karena adanya internet dan media-media massa independen, masyarakat Amerika pun kini percaya bahwa Serangan WTC adalah sebuah kejahatan konspirasi.
TEMUAN BARU YANG TIDAK BARU
Baru-baru ini 2 anggota legislatif Amerika (Congress) Stephen Lynch (D-MA) dan Walter Jones (R-NC) secara resmi mengajukan tuntutan kepada Presiden Barack Obama untuk "membongkar" laporan investigasi tentang Serangan WTC. Berdasarkan otoritas yang diberikan, mereka berdua mendapatkan 28 halaman laporan yang "disembunyikan" pemerintah dari 800 laporan yang lengkap. 28 halaman dari laporan tersebut adalah satu bab berjudul Specific Sources of Foreign Support. Dari laporan yang diberikan kepada Congress, antara 5 ribu hingga 10 ribu kata telah dihilangkan dan diganti dengan titik-titik.
Temuan itu membongkar tidak hanya keterlibatan negara "asing" dalam kejahatan Serangan WTC, namun juga keterlibatan pemerintah Amerika sendiri. Suara 2 orang anggota legislatif itu bisa dipastikan tidak akan mengubah banyak keadaan, namun setidaknya menjadi preseden baru bagi upaya pembongkaran konspirasi WTC.
REF:
"Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act"; Gordon Duff; Veterans Today; 18 Desember 2013
Mengapa "kalangan mapan" Amerika kini mulai gerah dengan "teori konspirasi" Serangan WTC tahun 2001? Bukankah ini menunjukkan bahwa "pada akhirnya kebenaran yang akan menang"?
Selama bertahun-tahun sebagian publik Amerika telah meyakini bahwa pemerintah Amerika terlibat dalam Serangan WTC. Sebelas tahun yang lalu Michael Moore telah lama menulis buku Stupid White Men dan dilanjutkan dengan film dokumenter Fahrenheit 911 yang memaparkan dengan jelas keterlibatan Presiden George Bush Jr dalam serangan tersebut. Puluhan kelompok masyarakat seperti asosiasi insinyur, asosiasi pemadam kebakaran, hingga para veteran pejabat keamanan dan inteligen Amerika telah mengirim petisi penolakan terhadap klaim pemerintah tentang Serangan WTC dan tuntutan diadakannya penyelidikan independen atas insiden tersebut. Tidak terhitung media-media dan blogger independen yang memaparkan secara mendetil konspirasi Serangan WTC.
Hingga pada tgl 17 Desember lalu blog milik kelompok "oposisi terkooptasi" Tea Party, Family Security Matters, menuliskan laporan keterlibatan kepala inteligen Saudi Pangeran Bandar bin Sultan dalam Serangan WTC. Sedikit berbeda dengan Michael Moore yang menekankan George W Bush sebagai konspirator utama dibantu kerajaan Saudi Arabia, maka laporan yang dibuat oleh Paul Sperry dari Hoover Institute tersebut menekankan pada peran Bandar bin Sultan sebagai konspirator utama dengan dibantu oleh George W Bush. Untuk adilnya anggap saja baik George W Bush maupun Bandar bin Sultan adalah konspirator utama Serangan WTC.
Tapi benarkah hal itu yang sebenarnya terjadi? Mengapa, baik Michael Moore maupun Paul Sperry tidak menyinggung keterlibatan Israel dan lobi yahudi Amerika? Mengapa mereka tidak menyinggung kedatangan Benjamin Netanyahu pada hari terjadinya Serangan WTC? Mengapa mereka tidak menyinggung peran Larry Silverstein, pemilik Kompleks WTC berdarah yahudi dengan dikenal dekat dengan para pejabat Israel? Mengapa mereka tidak menyinggung tentang "5 dancing Israelis", yaitu 5 agen Mossad yang menyamar sebagai pelajar Israel yang ditangkap polisi New York saat berpesta ria setelah merekam runtuhnya Gedung WTC?
Baik Michael Moore maupun Paul Sperry adalah "agen provokator" zionis internasional yang ditugaskan untuk mengalihkan perhatian publik dari keterlibatan Israel dan orang-orang yahudi, sama seperti Alex Jones dari Prisons Planet. Sementara Family Security Matters bukanlah sembarang blog. Ia adalah salah satu corong dari AIPAC, organisasi yahudi Amerika yang sangat berpengaruh. Editornya termasuk Senator Ted Cruz, mantan Menlu Condoleeza Rice dan mantan dubes Amerika di PBB yang sangat anti Islam, John Bolton.
Pemerintah Amerika dan Saudi tentu saja terlibat dalam konspirasi Serangan WTC, namun aktor utamanya adalah para zionis internasional.
Selama ini sebagian besar publik Amerika masih percaya pada keterangan pemerintah Amerika tentang Serangan WTC, yaitu sekelompok anggota Al Qaida dengan cara yang ajaib berhasil menerobos sistem keamanan bandara-bandara Amerika, membajak pesawat-pesawat komersil dan dengan ajaib pula mengendalikan pesawat-pesawat jet besar tersebut menghantam Menara Kembar WTC dan Gedung Pentagon. Keterangan pemerintah itu tidak menjelaskan mengapa sistem pertahanan udara Amerika yang sangat canggih itu tiba-tiba "mogok bekerja" sehingga pesawat-pesawat itu leluasa menabrakkan dirinya ke sasaran. Keterangan itu juga tidak menyebutkan runtuhnya Gedung WTC 7, gedung 47 lantai di kompleks WTC yang ikut-ikutan runtuh meski tidak terkena serangan.
Namun seiring berkembangnya informasi, terutama karena adanya internet dan media-media massa independen, masyarakat Amerika pun kini percaya bahwa Serangan WTC adalah sebuah kejahatan konspirasi.
TEMUAN BARU YANG TIDAK BARU
Baru-baru ini 2 anggota legislatif Amerika (Congress) Stephen Lynch (D-MA) dan Walter Jones (R-NC) secara resmi mengajukan tuntutan kepada Presiden Barack Obama untuk "membongkar" laporan investigasi tentang Serangan WTC. Berdasarkan otoritas yang diberikan, mereka berdua mendapatkan 28 halaman laporan yang "disembunyikan" pemerintah dari 800 laporan yang lengkap. 28 halaman dari laporan tersebut adalah satu bab berjudul Specific Sources of Foreign Support. Dari laporan yang diberikan kepada Congress, antara 5 ribu hingga 10 ribu kata telah dihilangkan dan diganti dengan titik-titik.
Temuan itu membongkar tidak hanya keterlibatan negara "asing" dalam kejahatan Serangan WTC, namun juga keterlibatan pemerintah Amerika sendiri. Suara 2 orang anggota legislatif itu bisa dipastikan tidak akan mengubah banyak keadaan, namun setidaknya menjadi preseden baru bagi upaya pembongkaran konspirasi WTC.
REF:
"Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act"; Gordon Duff; Veterans Today; 18 Desember 2013
Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act
Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:15AM GMT
41
By Gordon Duff
Two
members of Congress, specially authorized to view documents on 9/11
censored under the personal authority of President Bush (43), have come
away “absolutely shocked,” demanding immediate action.
However, the full story, told for the first time below, explains “why
now” and who is really being targeted by revelations of cover-up and
conspiracy.In accusations published yesterday by the leading Tea Party publication, Family Security Matters, Saudi Defense Minister and Intelligence chief Prince Bandar referred to as “Bandar Bush” in his Wikipedia biography for his close relationship with that family, was said to be the planner of 9/11.
In an article by Paul Sperry of the Hoover Institute, Bandar was cited with fleeing the US to avoid prosecution. Here, Sperry quotes a government source: “Our investigations contributed to the ambassador’s departure,” an investigator who worked with the Joint Terrorism Task Force in Washington told me, though Bandar says he left for “personal reasons.”
Despite these pronouncements, these accusations may well be unfounded speculation. What we have to ask is why are they being made now and why by political groups long close to the Saudi government. Why has Saudi Arabia failed to respond to these very public accusations coming from some of the highest authorities in Washington? “Why are the rats turning on each other?”
Startling disclosures?
This week, Congressional representatives Stephen Lynch (D-MA) and Walter Jones (R-NC) have officially requested a congressional resolution demanding President Obama declassify the heavily redacted Congressional Investigative Report on 9/11.The two representatives had just been given authority under penalty of “national security secrecy” to read the censored 28 pages of the 800-page report that had not been seen.
For nearly a decade, the US has maintained security policies, both domestic and international, based on threats now known to have been totally fabricated. The cost, trillions of dollars, thousands of Americans dead in wars against “enemies” long known to have never been involved in terror attacks on America, the phony “hunt for bin Laden,” all of it, nothing but utter hogwash.
Bush cited as conspirator
What has been made clear is that President Bush was fully aware that neither Afghanistan nor Iraq were involved in 9/11 and that military action against those two nations was done to cover involvement of his administration in 9/11, involvement that included support from foreign intelligence agencies.The representatives, while reviewing the report, came to the portion titled “Specific Sources of Foreign Support.” A 28-page section here had been “butchered” by the White House on the personal orders of President Bush. On the original report given to Congress, an estimated 5-10,000 words were omitted from this section with page after page of dotted lines replacing text.
The full report carries a tale of not only broad complicity of foreign intelligence agencies but, in the use of the term “complicity,” indications of full knowledge of the funding and planning of 9/11 by the Bush administration.
However, the lawmakers, without the support of a resolution, are under a “gag order” and unable to name the nation or nations that supplied.
Israel, Saudi Arabia or both
Recent revelations tied to events in Syria and Egypt have exposed an unimagined level of cooperation between the intelligence services of Israel and Saudi Arabia. For years, Israel has cited Saudi Arabia as the greatest threat to their security, much greater than Iraq under Saddam or their claims of a “nuclear Iran.” This and much else of what Israel has publicly claimed as part of their “mythology of victimization” is now recognized as falsehood. Though both Israel and Saudi Arabia are known as allies of the US, their partnerships with America have been with specific groups, extremists within government and the military willing to back the plots now plainly evident even when US interests are sacrificed or even American lives are lost.Telling, today, is the relationship between Al-Nusra and other al-Qaeda “franchises” and the Israeli/Saudi alliance, a relationship that has provided both financial support and weapons, used against Syria, Lebanon and Iraq.
The sections of the 9/11 report that were censored by President Bush may well include reference to that al-Qaeda/Israel/Saudi nexus. What is clear is that not only did the Bush administration wrongly blame bin Laden or “al-Qaeda,” a spurious and illusory group at best, but that those cited, Israel, Saudi Arabia or both, though named for funding and supporting the 9/11 attack, were always under the full control of the Bush administration.
What does exist is proof that the war on terror was, in reality as confirmed by General Wesley Clark, a plan to invade and occupy 7 oil- and gas-rich nations.
Israel put the blame on Saudi Arabia
In an article released yesterday on www.familysecuritymatters.org , Paul Sperry of the Hoover Institute cited, not just the Saudi government as having been behind 9/11 but set the relationship between George W. Bush and Prince Bandar at the crux of the conspiracy.After the 9/11 attacks, the public was told al-Qaeda acted alone, with no state sponsors. “But the White House never let it see an entire section of Congress’ investigative report on 9/11 dealing with “specific sources of foreign support” for the 19 hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi nationals.
It was kept secret and remains so today. President Bush inexplicably censored 28 full pages of the 800-page report.”
Sperry goes on: “Saudi consulate official Fahad al-Thumairy allegedly arranged for an advance team to receive two of the Saudi hijackers - Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi - as they arrived at LAX in 2000.”
Sperry goes on citing instance after instance where Saudi intelligence directly aided al-Qaeda every step of the way.
What is important is that we understand who Sperry represents. Family Security Matters isn’t a simple blog. It is the voice of not just the extreme right but AIPAC as well. Their editors include Senator Ted Cruz, top GOP domestic policy maker and former UN Ambassador John Bolton, Islamophobe extremist, “Israel Firster” and a man who never saw a war he didn’t love.
“Family Matters” is the power center for everything pro-money, pro-hate and pro-Israel. Self-proclaimed “investigative journalist Paul Sperry serves with the Hoover Institute, along with former Secretary of State Condi Rice. The critical aspect of yesterday’s article is that it represents the first time the Israel lobby has been willing to throw former President Bush “under a bus” in order to distance themselves from accusations of complicity in 9/11.
Prior to the exposure of Israel’s role as “mentor” for al-Qaeda in Syria, America’s media was able to suppress not just “conspiracy theories” but accusations backed by evidence and testimony that placed Israel at the center of the 9/11 attacks.
Prince Bandar accused of planning 9/11
Though there is no reason to assume Saudi Arabia is mentioned whatsoever in the redacted Congressional report, Sperry cites payments by Bandar to the alleged 9/11 hijackers and other funding to al-Qaeda.“Other al Qaeda funding was traced back to Bandar and his embassy - so much so that by 2004 Riggs Bank of Washington had dropped the Saudis as a client. The next year, as a number of embassy employees popped up in terror probes, Riyadh recalled Bandar.”
Real from conjecture
Members of Congress have openly admitted that they have seen documentation that would support an immediate criminal investigation against President Bush (43) and his closest advisors. Further, those agencies involved in compiling this report, key portions of which have remained secret, were also responsible for lying to the 9/11 Commission, not just through omission. All the intelligence that sent America into two wars is now not just suspect, it is proven false.Recognizing that the nations responsible have not yet been named, though attempts by Family Security Matters to subvert this process are underway, what does stand is evidence of the same conspiracy.
From a CIA transcript dated September 24, 2001, Osama bin Laden is quoted: “The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the US system, but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology could survive.”
Family Security Matters celebrates the death of Osama bin Laden as a terrorist fanatic. They also celebrate the death of Nelson Mandela as a terrorist fanatic. Mandela was right, as history has shown.
HJL/HJL
Gordon Duff
is a Marine Vietnam veteran, a combat infantryman, and Senior Editor at
Veterans Today. His career has included extensive experience in
international banking along with such diverse areas as consulting on
counter insurgency, defense technologies or acting as diplomatic
representative for UN humanitarian and economic development efforts.
Gordon Duff has traveled to over 80 nations. His articles are published
around the world and translated into a number of languages. He is
regularly on TV and radio, a popular and sometimes controversial guest.
More Press TV articles by Gordon Duff
‘Mossad, Bush planned, executed 9/11’
A
woman takes a moment to mourn lost relatives at the memorial site of
the now destroyed World Trade Center, New York, the US, September 11,
2013.
Wed Dec 25, 2013 8:19AM GMT
18
By Gordon Duff
Recent revelations published on the Press TV website, the New York Post and Veterans Today have changed history.
What is also clear is that President Bush’s personal role in covering this up protected the real perpetrators of 9/11 and pushed the US into, not just two insane wars but draconian moves against America’s government.
The NSA and the Bush 9/11 coup
Nine eleven was a coup against the constitution. Additional reports released this week make clear some of the reasons Bush lied to the American people, to congress, our military and our allies, “Obama’s Director for National Intelligence, James Clapper, has declassified new documents that reveal how the NSA was first given the green light to start collecting bulk communication data in the hunt for Al-Qaeda terrorists after 9/11. President Barack Obama’s administration has for the first time publicly confirmed ‘the existence of collection activities authorized by President George W. Bush,’ such as bulk amounts of Internet and phone metadata, as part of the ‘Terrorist Surveillance Program’ (TSP). The disclosures are part of Washington's campaign to justify the NSA’s surveillance activities, following massive leaks to the media about the classified programs by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. Clapper explained on Saturday that President George W. Bush first authorized the spying in October 2001, just weeks after the September 11 attacks.”We can prove Bush was fully criminally culpable in covering the tracks of those responsible for 9/11.
AIPAC through Bandar and bush “under a bus”
More frighteningly, the articles published this week in Rupert Murdoch’s New York Daily News, written by Hoover Institute fellow and AIPAC member, Paul Sperry, now not only blame Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia as the 9/11 mastermind but tie Bush (43) in as well.In fact, the entire AIPAC apparatus, the largest lobbying organization in Washington, is currently engaged in a “full court press,” to stop congress from pushing for the release of the real report. Is this because the real report accuses Israel, not Saudi Arabia, and AIPAC wants the Murdoch/Sperry story to stand?
Bin Laden myth “crashes down”
The real report, called “shocking” by the legislators, who have called for President Obama to declassify the entire report, proves that there was no al-Qaeda involvement, no reason to invade Afghanistan or Iraq and no reason to hunt CIA operative, Colonel Tim Osman, also known as “Osama bin Laden.”In fact, Ambassador Lee Wanta, a former White House Intelligence Chief and Inspector General of the Department of Defense under Reagan, has cited meetings between key government officials and “bin Laden” that he attended, meetings held in both Los Angeles and Washington DC while the US was supposedly hunting him.
From Wanta, who was present during these meetings, “In early 1990, bin Laden, suffering from advanced kidney disease, was flown to an American facility in the Persian Gulf. From there, bin Laden flew to Los Angeles, landing in the Ontario airport, met by Albert Hakim, representing President Bush (41), Ollie North (free on appeal bond), Admiral William Dickie, attorney Glenn Peglau and General Jack Singlaub, one of the founders of the CIA. Hakim was the personal representative of President Bush and in overall charge of the project. ‘Bud’ McFarlane, an Iran-Contra figure pardoned by President Bush in 1992, was also a part of the group.
Bin Laden then left Los Angeles for Washington DC. There he stayed in the Mayflower Hotel. Meetings were held at the Metropolitan Club in Washington. Attorney Glenn Peglau stayed at the Metropolitan. While there, Peglau’s room was broken into and “items” removed. At no point is there record, classified or public, that this ‘working group’ was ever dissolved nor is there any record that Osama bin Laden’s status as a security operative working for the US government ever ended. In 2001, Osama bin Laden’s last public statement denied any involvement in the 9/11 attacks. There are no classified documents tying bin Laden to 9/11 or citing him to be a ‘rogue CIA operative.’”
Which 9/11 is real?
In 2007, the FBI flew a team to Bangkok to interview former Soviet nuclear intelligence specialist Dimitri Khalezov. Khalezov told the FBI that, in the morning of September 12, 2001, he attended a breakfast gathering with Mossad Operations Chief Mike Harari and his son along with other Israeli operatives.Khalezov reported to the FBI that this gathering was to celebrate the 9/11 attacks, not as Netanyahu had said, as a “fortunate happenstance for Israel” but as a Mossad attack on the United States. At that meeting, Harari also claimed credit for a role in the Oklahoma City bombing. According to Khalezov, Harari was courting him to join their group for an upcoming operation, a bombing attack on Bali, scheduled for 2002.
On October 12, 2002, a huge explosive device devastated nearly a square mile killing 202 people. An Islamic group was blamed, just as with not just 9/11 but, initially, Oklahoma City as well.
Khalezov told FBI agents that Harari claimed nuclear weapons were used to bring down the twin towers on 9/11. Harari also said he got a “cruise type” missile, a Soviet “Granit” for the Pentagon attack, purchased through Victor Bout, the “Lord of War” played by Nicholas Cage in the film of the same name.
Bout, residing in Bangkok with Harari and Khalezov, was extradited to the United States based on a highly classified indictment accusing him of supplying the guided missile used to attack the Pentagon on 9/11. Bout was arrested in Bangkok in 2008, not long after the FBI visit. He was officially convicted of supplying arms to rebels in Colombia, an activity Bout had long been engaged in on behalf of the CIA, his arms dealing partners for many years.
Leaks
Thus far, the initial report to congress on the Bush falsification does not qualify as a leak. Only Bush stands accused, the 9/11 perpetrators are still safe, their identities still protected by security protocols maintained by President Obama, despite congressional demands.“Claimed” leaks reported by Sperry in the Washington Post blame Bandar and Saudi Intelligence for 9/11. Sperry cites the CIA as a source but, quite suspiciously, seems to be attempting to deflect the possible fallout against Israel when or if then real report is made public. The Sperry story, coordinated with AIPAC’s moves to quell congress’s demand to declassify the report may well be an indication that Israeli intelligence, as Khalezov indicates, worked with Bush to plan and execute 9/11.
From the Press TV article: “This week, Congressional representatives Stephen Lynch (D-MA) and Walter Jones (R-NC) have officially requested a congressional resolution demanding President Obama declassify the heavily redacted Congressional Investigative Report on 9/11. The two representatives had just been given authority under penalty of ‘national security secrecy’ to read the censored 28 pages of the 800-page report that had not been seen. What has been made clear is that President Bush was fully aware that neither Afghanistan nor Iraq were involved in 9/11 and that military action against those two nations was done to cover involvement of his administration in 9/11, involvement that included support from foreign intelligence agencies. The representatives, while reviewing the report, came to the portion titled ‘Specific Sources of Foreign Support.’
A 28-page section here had been ‘butchered’ by the White House on the personal orders of President Bush. On the original report given to Congress, an estimated 5-10,000 words were omitted from this section with page after page of dotted lines replacing text.”
This is only the most recent of revelations that AIPAC has managed to suppress through pressuring congress and its powerful assets in the press. What is increasingly clear is that many of AIPAC’s allies in Washington had access to the non-redacted report. An entire administration, leaders in congress and the Pentagon, the CIA, NSA and a dozen other organizations, all knew what was in the congressional report. They all lied to the 9/11 Commission. They all ordered measures to suppress freedom at home and to butcher hundreds of thousands around the world, kidnap and torture thousand more, all based on lies.
Countries were virtually wiped off the map on a whim. Often we hear it asked, “How could thousands be involved in a conspiracy so heinous?” We now stand ready to answer. The time has come to ask.
HJL/HJL
Israel provoking US to wage war on Syria: Kevin Barrett
Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:51AM GMT
8
Interview with Kevin Barrett
Today
the US enjoys a massive military advantage on the world. And these
crazy people like Lemnitzer (US General) who wanted to incinerate the
planet in (Operation Northwoods) 1962 are willing to incinerate the
planet today in order to try to preserve this US hegemony over the
world. So the Israelis are provoking people like that to try to start
this war."
Press
TV has conducted an interview with Kevin Barrett, an author and Middle
East expert from Madison, the capital of the US state of Wisconsin,
about the latest developments in Syria. The following is an approximate
transcript of the interview.
Press TV:
First of all about who could have used these
weapons - apparently the assessment according to Washington is based on
the idea that the Syrian government has a large stockpile of chemical
arms; that the insurgents don’t have the capability to launch this kind
of an attack; but there are people who are asking couldn’t have been
provided with the arms and the question there that Mr. Wolf (other Press
TV guest) was also putting - What is your response to that?
Barrett:
Wikileaks documents showed that high-level Western
so-called security consultants and mercenary firms were planning as
early as last Spring to launch a false-flag chemical attack in Syria,
blame it on the Assad government and use that as a pretext to invade
Syria.
And that appears to be exactly what has happened.
In this case Mr. Wolf is very badly misinformed if he thinks that the reason that the UN inspection team was turned back when they reached the so-called rebel-held area was because they came under fire from the Syrian government - that was escorting them? I’m sorry Sir, but they came under fire from the al-Qaeda rebels who launched this chemical weapons attack.
How do we know that? We know that because the Israelis, spoke up just a few minutes after the attack and blamed it on Assad and laid out their preferred road map to what should follow.
This is what the Israelis do every time they launch a major false flag attack, they get on the television just like Ehud Barak got on television just minutes after the planes hit the buildings on 9/11 - he was already in the BBC studio blaming al-Qaeda, calling for a “war on terror” and telling the US to invade Iraq and Afghanistan.
And you Sir are a big liar and arguably a war criminal for encouraging a war that could lead to world war III and propagandizing for war crimes. You should be ashamed of yourself, Sir. You are propagandizing for mass murder.
And that appears to be exactly what has happened.
In this case Mr. Wolf is very badly misinformed if he thinks that the reason that the UN inspection team was turned back when they reached the so-called rebel-held area was because they came under fire from the Syrian government - that was escorting them? I’m sorry Sir, but they came under fire from the al-Qaeda rebels who launched this chemical weapons attack.
How do we know that? We know that because the Israelis, spoke up just a few minutes after the attack and blamed it on Assad and laid out their preferred road map to what should follow.
This is what the Israelis do every time they launch a major false flag attack, they get on the television just like Ehud Barak got on television just minutes after the planes hit the buildings on 9/11 - he was already in the BBC studio blaming al-Qaeda, calling for a “war on terror” and telling the US to invade Iraq and Afghanistan.
So, there is no question that in this case we are seeing the biggest Israeli false-flag attack since 9/11 and it is designed to accelerate this move towards world war III so that the Israelis can flee forward into world war to cover their tracks for the 9/11 inside job and they’re being exposed even today.And now Russia and China are stepping forward and saying this was a false-flag attack, this was not done by Syria.
This idea that the Syrian government would use chemicals weapons that would cross the red line at exactly the moment that chemical weapons inspectors arrived in Syria is the worst kind of conspiracy theory.If you (Mr. Wolf) believe that Assad would use chemical weapons at the exact moment that weapons inspectors arrived in Syria, you are out of your mind. You probably believed that Iraq had chemical weapons when Bush and Colin Powell were assuring us that they did - and that was a big lie and this is a big lie.
And you Sir are a big liar and arguably a war criminal for encouraging a war that could lead to world war III and propagandizing for war crimes. You should be ashamed of yourself, Sir. You are propagandizing for mass murder.
Press TV:
We had references there to Bandar bin Sultan. What
do you think about his role? We are hearing according to some reports -
he is the Saudi intelligence chief - that he was mandated by the US to
topple the Syrian government. Do you think there is a role here by Saudi
Arabia?
Barrett:
Absolutely. Bandar Bin Sultan’s nickname here in the
US is ‘Bandar Bush’. He has been a major operative with the Bush crime
family for decades and he is essentially a front-man for the Bush crime
family and its allies in the US intelligence community who are actually a
bunch of traitors who are opposed by all the patriots over here.
So, it seems quite likely that the treasonous wing of the powers that be here in the US and their Israeli puppet masters have indeed empowered Bandar and his friends to use their considerable corrupt money and influence to try to topple the Assad government.
But what’s really important here is that the Russians and the Chinese appear to be drawing a line in the sand and saying, “No, you can’t do this, we let you ravage the Middle East, kill millions in Iraq, destroy Syria, destroy Sudan etc etc, but we’re not going to let you destroy Syria and Iran. I’m sorry, but you’ve gone too far this time”.
Indeed, the Syrian government knows who its real enemy is. President Assad has said that if there is western intervention he will he will consider it an Israeli strike because he know exactly who is in control of this effort to overthrow him and he will target Israel. And Iran, Iraq and Lebanon will join him on targeting Israel.
Now, this of course is risking world war III since Russia and China are backing that alliance of those four countries. It’s a terribly dangerous time and it’s very important to demand that the truth about this alleged chemical attack, which echoes all of these nonsense false stories that we were told about WMDs in Iraq that justified a US invasion of Iraq. The truth about this be found. There should be no strike until that truth is found.
So, it seems quite likely that the treasonous wing of the powers that be here in the US and their Israeli puppet masters have indeed empowered Bandar and his friends to use their considerable corrupt money and influence to try to topple the Assad government.
But what’s really important here is that the Russians and the Chinese appear to be drawing a line in the sand and saying, “No, you can’t do this, we let you ravage the Middle East, kill millions in Iraq, destroy Syria, destroy Sudan etc etc, but we’re not going to let you destroy Syria and Iran. I’m sorry, but you’ve gone too far this time”.
Indeed, the Syrian government knows who its real enemy is. President Assad has said that if there is western intervention he will he will consider it an Israeli strike because he know exactly who is in control of this effort to overthrow him and he will target Israel. And Iran, Iraq and Lebanon will join him on targeting Israel.
Now, this of course is risking world war III since Russia and China are backing that alliance of those four countries. It’s a terribly dangerous time and it’s very important to demand that the truth about this alleged chemical attack, which echoes all of these nonsense false stories that we were told about WMDs in Iraq that justified a US invasion of Iraq. The truth about this be found. There should be no strike until that truth is found.
Press TV:
A lot of people are asking now whether we are going
to see this military strike take place. There is a lot of anticipation
in the air. The thing is we are hearing about Obama talking about target
updating; the insurgents say they’ve been consulted about targets.
Do you think that despite the consequences that you referred to earlier that this could turn into a regional war, even you said there, a bigger war - Do you think despite that the United States is going to strike?
Do you think that despite the consequences that you referred to earlier that this could turn into a regional war, even you said there, a bigger war - Do you think despite that the United States is going to strike?
Barrett:
Well I didn’t think so three days ago. But I’m
becoming more worried because it seems they are laying all the pieces in
place for a strike and I should defer to Mr. Wolf and say that it isn’t
just the Israeli’s who are a problem here it is also the hard-line
faction here in the US.
It’s very much like the situation in 1962 regarding Cuba and Russia, when the majority of the Joint Chiefs of Staff wanted a nuclear war with Russia, a pre-emptive war to stop Russia from developing a big nuclear arsenal.
Today the US enjoys a massive military advantage on the world. And these crazy people like Lemnitzer (US General) who wanted to incinerate the planet in (Operation Northwoods) 1962 are willing to incinerate the planet today in order to try to preserve this US hegemony over the world. So the Israelis are provoking people like that to try to start this war.
All of us who want peace and stability in the world need to stand up against them and tell them no, we are drawing a red line on Syria - No war in Syria.
The Israelis have completely run US foreign policy since they staged the 9/11 coup d’état ... Obama and Hagel have been holding the line against the neo-conservative Israelis who took over this country (the US) in a coup d’etat in 2001... Netanyahu invented the war on terror in 1979 at the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism.
It’s very much like the situation in 1962 regarding Cuba and Russia, when the majority of the Joint Chiefs of Staff wanted a nuclear war with Russia, a pre-emptive war to stop Russia from developing a big nuclear arsenal.
Today the US enjoys a massive military advantage on the world. And these crazy people like Lemnitzer (US General) who wanted to incinerate the planet in (Operation Northwoods) 1962 are willing to incinerate the planet today in order to try to preserve this US hegemony over the world. So the Israelis are provoking people like that to try to start this war.
All of us who want peace and stability in the world need to stand up against them and tell them no, we are drawing a red line on Syria - No war in Syria.
The Israelis have completely run US foreign policy since they staged the 9/11 coup d’état ... Obama and Hagel have been holding the line against the neo-conservative Israelis who took over this country (the US) in a coup d’etat in 2001... Netanyahu invented the war on terror in 1979 at the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism.
Press TV:
Could you be more clear about Israel’s role
specifically in this Syrian situation right now as well just to give an
answer to that question raised by Mr. Wolf?
It is the Israelis who are behind the destabilization of Syria for obvious geo-strategic reasons.
SC/NN
Barrett: Israel wants to destabilize Syria and destabilize other Middle Eastern countries. It’s the Oded Yinon plan - look for that in the search engine. Israel’s strategic doctrine is to break up its neighboring countries into small Balkanized ethnic and sectarian units - That’s what they’re trying to do in Syria.
It is the Israelis who are behind the destabilization of Syria for obvious geo-strategic reasons.
SC/NN
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar